https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/j ... ew/0/47745
Author: Wallace Manheimer
Achievements: 1993 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to the analysis of nonlinear phenomena in plasma and electron beams.
1980 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS)
Field of Study:
Quantum mechanics
Electron
Optics
His main research concerns Atomic physics, Plasma, Electron, Beam and Magnetic field. Wallace M. Manheimer has researched Atomic physics in several fields, including Computational physics, Ion, Cyclotron, Relativistic electron beam and Inertial confinement fusion. His work deals with themes such as Electromagnetic radiation, Ionization, Quantum electrodynamics and Heat flux, which intersect with Plasma.
His research integrates issues of Omega, Charged particle, Microwave and Modulational instability in his study of Electron. Wallace M. Manheimer studied Beam and Cathode ray that intersect with Space charge. His Magnetic field research incorporates themes from Field and Optics.
While the Climate Always Has and Always Will Change, There Is no Climate Crisis
Abstract
The emphasis on a false climate crisis is becoming a tragedy for modern civilization, which depends on relible, economic, and environmentally viable energy. The windmills, solar panels and backup batteries have none if these qualities. This falsehood is pushed by a powerful lobby which Bjorn Lomborg has called a climate industrial complex, comprising some scientists, most media, industrialists, and legislators. It has somehow managed to convince many that CO2 in the atmosphere, a gas necessary for life on earth, one which we exhale with every breath, is an environmental poison. Multiple scientific theories and measurements show that there is no climate crisis. Radiation forcing calculations by both skeptics and believers show that the carbon dioxide radiation forcicng is about 0.3% of the incident radiation, far less than other effects on climate. Over the period of human civilization, the temperature has oscillated between quite a few warm and cold periods, with many of the warm periods being warmer than today. During geological times, it and the carbon dioxide level have been all over the place with no correlation between them.
Papers debunking the nonsense of co2 induced climate change
-
Tankanator
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2022 6:16 pm
In 2009 there was a leak to Wikileaks of the Climate scientists for the IPCC
IPCC was setup by UN that predicted social collapse every year since 1950.
Emails in attached book. https://wikispooks.com/w/images/d/d6/Cl ... emails.pdf
When Phil Jones (one of the main characters of climategate was asked for data prior to the leak) he said
It should be noted that it was Phil Jones corrupt data that led to the "hockey stick" graph everyone is familiar with. If anyone is familiar with the United Nations and it's precedent of predicting collapse this is no surprise to anyone.
The UN is an American captured institution and has been predicting collapse every decade since the 1950s.
IPCC was setup by UN that predicted social collapse every year since 1950.
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/ClimategateIn 2009 Wikileaks published <1000 emails from the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scientists. Most of these emails are not spectacular, but some mention how easy it is to deceive peer reviewers and the public alike.
Several referenced emails contain joking remarks about how they massaged statistics, i.e.
truncating the temperature and time axis on diagrams
omitting data from measurement stations that were "too cold to be included"
failing to mention contradicting information, i.e.
polar ice data from Patagonia (the other pole, where ice is increasing)
failing to report standard deviations or volatility measures
failing to mention conflicts of interest, explicit joking about easy available grants and salaries
omitting a decent timeline of several thousand years
Emails in attached book. https://wikispooks.com/w/images/d/d6/Cl ... emails.pdf
When Phil Jones (one of the main characters of climategate was asked for data prior to the leak) he said
After the leak he was forced to admitWhy should I make my data available to you when your aim is to find something wrong with it?
https://web.archive.org/web/20100217190 ... nised.htmlProfessor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.
And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.
It should be noted that it was Phil Jones corrupt data that led to the "hockey stick" graph everyone is familiar with. If anyone is familiar with the United Nations and it's precedent of predicting collapse this is no surprise to anyone.
The UN is an American captured institution and has been predicting collapse every decade since the 1950s.
Valentina Zharkova
Credentials
Her publications are here https://solargsm.com/publications/ with her research team. She specialises in sunspots, plasma physics and Solar cycles and how those affect the temperature on earth.
She states categorically that the sun is going into a "Maunder minimum" cycle where the sunspots are ebbing down meaning we have entered a mini ice age starting from now to 2050
From her chart note Cycle 26 with reduced sunspot activity. The world will become a lot colder in the upcoming period.
It's hilarious how the eugenicists have managed to convince people there's a "climate crisis" of global warming
Here's her 2015 press release on the coming mini ice age due to minimal solar spot activity
Credentials
https://www.northumbria.ac.uk/about-us/ ... -zharkova/Graduated with first class with distinction degree in Applied Math from Kiev National University, Kiev, Ukraine (1975); did PhD in Astrophysics ‘Radiative transfer of solar prominences’ at Main Astronomical Observatory, Kiev, Ukraine, viva in 1984. Worked as Researcher/Lecturer/ Senior Lecturer at KNU (1975-1994). In 1992 moved to Glasgow University, UK as Senior Research Fellow to investigate energetic particles in solar flares. Discovered sunquakes induced by flaring processes, published a paper in Nature, 1998 with wide media coverage. In 2000 moved to Bradford University as Lecturer, then Reader (2002) and Professor of Applied Mathematics (2005). Joined Northumbria University in September 2013 as Professor of Mathematics. Taught the key Maths and Physics modules. Published more then 200 papers, from which 3 papers in Nature group journals (during work at NU), one of the papers was predicting the modern Grand Solar Minimum (2020-2053). Published a monograph on particle kinetics, was an Editor a book on automated recognition and classification of digital images and the RHESSI book on high energy particles. Also published 18 chapters in other books. Received funding from European Commission, EPSRC, STFC, the Royal society, the RAS and US Airforce. At NU was the MPEE department Lead in international affairs (2014-2016) and in Equality and Diversity (2018-2020).
Her publications are here https://solargsm.com/publications/ with her research team. She specialises in sunspots, plasma physics and Solar cycles and how those affect the temperature on earth.
She states categorically that the sun is going into a "Maunder minimum" cycle where the sunspots are ebbing down meaning we have entered a mini ice age starting from now to 2050
"In the next 30 years climate change will be the last thing on our mind".
From her chart note Cycle 26 with reduced sunspot activity. The world will become a lot colder in the upcoming period.
- Screenshot from 2023-01-18 14-26-03.png (726.73 KiB) Viewed 1177 times
Here's her 2015 press release on the coming mini ice age due to minimal solar spot activity
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 092955.htmPredictions from the model suggest that solar activity will fall by 60 per cent during the 2030s to conditions last seen during the 'mini ice age' that began in 1645.
-
Tankanator
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2022 6:16 pm
In particular CO2, absorbs energy at a certain wavelengths. There is only so much energy at those wavelengths (mostly infrared) to absorb. Already at 400ppm the fraction of energy that CO2 can absorb that is absorbed is already very high. The jargon for
this is that the CO2 radiation band is saturated. There is not enough reflected energy at the wavelength that CO2 absorbs to allow it to continue contributing a warming effect itself. This why the planet has had levels of 6000ppm and life survived just fine. This is also why the dominant warming effect in Climate BS models is _not_ CO2 but H2O vapour. But these models all ignore negative feedback loops on the planet and don't model clouds correctly, which many physicists see as the more likely dominant cooling/warming model via solar activity. Here's a recent paper discussing the overblown predictions of pure CO2 based warming, upon which the H20 vapour runaway effect is constructed.
https://notrickszone.com/2022/11/24/stu ... o2-is-not/
Also here's a great video by Dr. William Happer who was a decorated physicist at Princeton. He clearly describes the CO2-band saturation issue and does so within 20 min of beginning of talk. This is a good layman's talk and covers a number of objections that physicists have with current climate models.
Here is another talk, a bit more technical but also for a semi-lay audience with two highly decorated physicists, one of them a Nobel Laureate Elliott Bloom
this is that the CO2 radiation band is saturated. There is not enough reflected energy at the wavelength that CO2 absorbs to allow it to continue contributing a warming effect itself. This why the planet has had levels of 6000ppm and life survived just fine. This is also why the dominant warming effect in Climate BS models is _not_ CO2 but H2O vapour. But these models all ignore negative feedback loops on the planet and don't model clouds correctly, which many physicists see as the more likely dominant cooling/warming model via solar activity. Here's a recent paper discussing the overblown predictions of pure CO2 based warming, upon which the H20 vapour runaway effect is constructed.
https://notrickszone.com/2022/11/24/stu ... o2-is-not/
Also here's a great video by Dr. William Happer who was a decorated physicist at Princeton. He clearly describes the CO2-band saturation issue and does so within 20 min of beginning of talk. This is a good layman's talk and covers a number of objections that physicists have with current climate models.
Here is another talk, a bit more technical but also for a semi-lay audience with two highly decorated physicists, one of them a Nobel Laureate Elliott Bloom
Global warming and the confrontation between the West and the rest of the world
The theory of the anthropogenic cause of global warming will soon be at the center of the confrontation between the West and Russia. While no one denies that some parts of the world are warming, there is currently no alternative explanation for this phenomenon. But renowned scientists will be presenting another at COP-28 in Dubai. They happen to be members of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
The theory that global warming is observable all over the planet and that it is caused by human activity has been popularized by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); a United Nations commission.
I have no expertise in climate issues and I don’t presume to judge whether this theory is true or false, but I am an expert in international politics and I can assess the work of this UN commission.
Ten years ago, I wrote that, as its name suggests, the IPCC is not a learned academy at all, but an intergovernmental group [1]. Its conclusions are therefore not the fruit of a scientific approach, but of a political debate.
The IPCC was created on the initiative of the British Prime Minister, Margareth Thatcher, to support her fight against the miners’ unions. Unsurprisingly, it concluded that coal is bad for the environment, while nuclear power is desirable. This is not a scientific theorem, but a political statement.
Furthermore, I pointed out that the creation of greenhouse gas emission rights is not an intergovernmental initiative, but an idea of the Joyce Foundation, implemented by Climate Exchange Ltd. [2]. Each state drafts its own legislation on the subject. It receives a certain quantity of emission rights, which it allocates as it sees fit to companies. Companies that only partially use their rights can resell them on a specialized stock exchange in Chicago.
The articles of association for this exchange were drafted by a then unknown Joyce Foundation lawyer, a certain Barack Obama (future President of the United States). The call for investors to launch the exchange was organized by Al Gore (future vice-president of the United States), and David Blood (former director of Goldman Sachs bank). Whether you consider these people to be bona fide environmental activists or high-flying swindlers is a matter of perspective.
Over time, this political device has been cloaked in a veneer of science and good intentions, making it difficult to question. Yet there is an alternative scientific theory to explain global warming. It was put forward by Croatian geophysicist Milutin Milanković between the wars.
The Earth’s orbit varies according to three natural cycles: eccentricity, obliquity and the precession of the equinoxes. Each of these variations follows a cycle, between 20,000 and 100,000 years, which is perfectly calculable. Combined, these three variations influence the Earth’s insolation and hence its climate. This theory was confirmed in 1976 by the study of ice cores from the Vostok drilling project in Antarctica. But it doesn’t explain everything.
The Russian Academy of Sciences has just put forward a third theory, also based on observation of nature. According to it, "The main cause of local climatic catastrophes is the increasing emission of natural hydrogen due to the alternating gravitational forces of the moon and sun, which cause holes in the ozone layer. The resulting rise in temperature and the mixing of ozone and hydrogen are the main causes of forest and steppe fires" [3]].
The Académie des Sciences not only questions the dogma of the IPCC, it also challenges the mechanism for reducing holes in the ozone layer. Namely, the Vienna Convention and the Montreal Protocol "whose implementation has wiped out entire sub-industries of the chemical industry without affecting the size of ozone holes, which have only increased".
The Russian Academy of Sciences’ theory is also based on the idea that global warming is not a comparable phenomenon in different parts of the world. Contrary to popular belief, the temperature of the Pacific Ocean is actually cooling [4].
The findings of the Russian Academy of Sciences will be presented at COP-28 in Dubai in late November/early December. A political battle is already underway to silence the scientists. It concerns the appointment of the session chairman, who will be able to give the floor to the troublemakers or, on the contrary, silence them. Mohammed ben Zayed, the ruler of the United Arab Emirates, is in charge of choosing the chairman. He has appointed Sultan al-Jaber, his Minister of Industry. US and EU parliamentarians immediately wrote to UN Secretary-General António Guterres, asking him to oppose the move. Their argument, as ever, is irrelevant to their objective. They argue that Sultan al-Jaber is also Chairman of the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (Adnoc). He would therefore be judge and jury. Instead, they recommend appointing a non-fossil fuel lobbyist. He would also be judge and jury, but for the opposing camp.
If Russian scientists speak out at COP-28, the assembly is likely to split in two, not along scientific but political lines. Anglo-Saxon supporters versus Russian supporters (the rest of the world). There’s no doubt that the IPCC dogma will soon become the idée fixe of the West and the laughing stock of the rest of the world.
The theory of the anthropogenic cause of global warming will soon be at the center of the confrontation between the West and Russia. While no one denies that some parts of the world are warming, there is currently no alternative explanation for this phenomenon. But renowned scientists will be presenting another at COP-28 in Dubai. They happen to be members of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
The theory that global warming is observable all over the planet and that it is caused by human activity has been popularized by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); a United Nations commission.
I have no expertise in climate issues and I don’t presume to judge whether this theory is true or false, but I am an expert in international politics and I can assess the work of this UN commission.
Ten years ago, I wrote that, as its name suggests, the IPCC is not a learned academy at all, but an intergovernmental group [1]. Its conclusions are therefore not the fruit of a scientific approach, but of a political debate.
The IPCC was created on the initiative of the British Prime Minister, Margareth Thatcher, to support her fight against the miners’ unions. Unsurprisingly, it concluded that coal is bad for the environment, while nuclear power is desirable. This is not a scientific theorem, but a political statement.
Furthermore, I pointed out that the creation of greenhouse gas emission rights is not an intergovernmental initiative, but an idea of the Joyce Foundation, implemented by Climate Exchange Ltd. [2]. Each state drafts its own legislation on the subject. It receives a certain quantity of emission rights, which it allocates as it sees fit to companies. Companies that only partially use their rights can resell them on a specialized stock exchange in Chicago.
The articles of association for this exchange were drafted by a then unknown Joyce Foundation lawyer, a certain Barack Obama (future President of the United States). The call for investors to launch the exchange was organized by Al Gore (future vice-president of the United States), and David Blood (former director of Goldman Sachs bank). Whether you consider these people to be bona fide environmental activists or high-flying swindlers is a matter of perspective.
Over time, this political device has been cloaked in a veneer of science and good intentions, making it difficult to question. Yet there is an alternative scientific theory to explain global warming. It was put forward by Croatian geophysicist Milutin Milanković between the wars.
The Earth’s orbit varies according to three natural cycles: eccentricity, obliquity and the precession of the equinoxes. Each of these variations follows a cycle, between 20,000 and 100,000 years, which is perfectly calculable. Combined, these three variations influence the Earth’s insolation and hence its climate. This theory was confirmed in 1976 by the study of ice cores from the Vostok drilling project in Antarctica. But it doesn’t explain everything.
The Russian Academy of Sciences has just put forward a third theory, also based on observation of nature. According to it, "The main cause of local climatic catastrophes is the increasing emission of natural hydrogen due to the alternating gravitational forces of the moon and sun, which cause holes in the ozone layer. The resulting rise in temperature and the mixing of ozone and hydrogen are the main causes of forest and steppe fires" [3]].
The Académie des Sciences not only questions the dogma of the IPCC, it also challenges the mechanism for reducing holes in the ozone layer. Namely, the Vienna Convention and the Montreal Protocol "whose implementation has wiped out entire sub-industries of the chemical industry without affecting the size of ozone holes, which have only increased".
The Russian Academy of Sciences’ theory is also based on the idea that global warming is not a comparable phenomenon in different parts of the world. Contrary to popular belief, the temperature of the Pacific Ocean is actually cooling [4].
The findings of the Russian Academy of Sciences will be presented at COP-28 in Dubai in late November/early December. A political battle is already underway to silence the scientists. It concerns the appointment of the session chairman, who will be able to give the floor to the troublemakers or, on the contrary, silence them. Mohammed ben Zayed, the ruler of the United Arab Emirates, is in charge of choosing the chairman. He has appointed Sultan al-Jaber, his Minister of Industry. US and EU parliamentarians immediately wrote to UN Secretary-General António Guterres, asking him to oppose the move. Their argument, as ever, is irrelevant to their objective. They argue that Sultan al-Jaber is also Chairman of the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (Adnoc). He would therefore be judge and jury. Instead, they recommend appointing a non-fossil fuel lobbyist. He would also be judge and jury, but for the opposing camp.
If Russian scientists speak out at COP-28, the assembly is likely to split in two, not along scientific but political lines. Anglo-Saxon supporters versus Russian supporters (the rest of the world). There’s no doubt that the IPCC dogma will soon become the idée fixe of the West and the laughing stock of the rest of the world.
-
AgentSonya
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2023 1:13 pm
Dr. William Happer, Professor Emeritus in the Department of Physics at Princeton University, is a specialist in modern optics, optical and radiofrequency spectroscopy of atoms and molecules, radiation propagation in the atmosphere, and spin-polarized atoms and nuclei.
Dr. Happer received a B.S. degree in Physics from the University of North Carolina in l960 and the PhD degree in Physics from Princeton University in l964. He began his academic career in 1964 at Columbia University. While serving as a Professor of Physics he also served as Co-Director of the Columbia Radiation Laboratory from 1971 to 1976, and Director from 1976 to 1979. In l980 he joined the faculty at Princeton University. On August 5, 1991 he was appointed Director of Energy Research in the Department of Energy by President George Bush. While serving in that capacity under Secretary of Energy James Watkins, he oversaw a basic research budget of some $3 billion, which included much of the federal funding for high energy and nuclear physics, materials science, magnetic confinement fusion, environmental and climate science, the human genome project, and other areas. He was reappointed Professor of Physics at Princeton University on June 1, 1993, and named Eugene Higgens Professor of Physics and Chair of the University Research Board from 1995 to 2005. From 2003 until his retirement in 2014, he held the Cyrus Fogg Brackett Chair of Physics. Starting on September 15 2018 he served one year as Deputy Assistant to the President and Senior Director of Emerging Technologies in the National Security Council of the White House.
From 1987 to 1990 he served as Chairman of the Steering Committee of JASON, a group of scientists and engineers who advise agencies of the Federal Government on matters of defense, intelligence, energy policy and other technical problems. He was a trustee of the MITRE Corporation from 1993 to 2011, he is the Chair of the Board of the Richard Lounsbery Foundation, and the Chair of the Board of the Marshall Institute. He was a co- founder in 1994 of Magnetic Imaging Technologies Incorporated (MITI), a small company specializing in the use of laser polarized noble gases for magnetic resonance imaging. He was a co-founder of the CO2 Coalition, a non-profit organization that publicizes the benefits of atmospheric carbon dioxide to life. He invented the sodium guidestar that is used in astronomical adaptive optics to correct for the degrading effects of atmospheric turbulence.
He has published over 200 peer-reviewed scientific papers. He is a Fellow of the American Physical Society, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the National Academy of Sciences and the American Philosophical Society. He was awarded an Alfred P. Sloan Fellowship in 1966, an Alexander von Humboldt Award in 1976, the 1997 Broida Prize and the 1999 Davisson-Germer Prize of the American Physical Society, and the Thomas Alva Edison Patent Award in 2000.
Dr. Happer was married in 1967 to Barbara Jean Baker of Rahway, New Jersey. They have two grown children, James William and Gladys Anne and six grandchildren.
Dr. Happer received a B.S. degree in Physics from the University of North Carolina in l960 and the PhD degree in Physics from Princeton University in l964. He began his academic career in 1964 at Columbia University. While serving as a Professor of Physics he also served as Co-Director of the Columbia Radiation Laboratory from 1971 to 1976, and Director from 1976 to 1979. In l980 he joined the faculty at Princeton University. On August 5, 1991 he was appointed Director of Energy Research in the Department of Energy by President George Bush. While serving in that capacity under Secretary of Energy James Watkins, he oversaw a basic research budget of some $3 billion, which included much of the federal funding for high energy and nuclear physics, materials science, magnetic confinement fusion, environmental and climate science, the human genome project, and other areas. He was reappointed Professor of Physics at Princeton University on June 1, 1993, and named Eugene Higgens Professor of Physics and Chair of the University Research Board from 1995 to 2005. From 2003 until his retirement in 2014, he held the Cyrus Fogg Brackett Chair of Physics. Starting on September 15 2018 he served one year as Deputy Assistant to the President and Senior Director of Emerging Technologies in the National Security Council of the White House.
From 1987 to 1990 he served as Chairman of the Steering Committee of JASON, a group of scientists and engineers who advise agencies of the Federal Government on matters of defense, intelligence, energy policy and other technical problems. He was a trustee of the MITRE Corporation from 1993 to 2011, he is the Chair of the Board of the Richard Lounsbery Foundation, and the Chair of the Board of the Marshall Institute. He was a co- founder in 1994 of Magnetic Imaging Technologies Incorporated (MITI), a small company specializing in the use of laser polarized noble gases for magnetic resonance imaging. He was a co-founder of the CO2 Coalition, a non-profit organization that publicizes the benefits of atmospheric carbon dioxide to life. He invented the sodium guidestar that is used in astronomical adaptive optics to correct for the degrading effects of atmospheric turbulence.
He has published over 200 peer-reviewed scientific papers. He is a Fellow of the American Physical Society, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the National Academy of Sciences and the American Philosophical Society. He was awarded an Alfred P. Sloan Fellowship in 1966, an Alexander von Humboldt Award in 1976, the 1997 Broida Prize and the 1999 Davisson-Germer Prize of the American Physical Society, and the Thomas Alva Edison Patent Award in 2000.
Dr. Happer was married in 1967 to Barbara Jean Baker of Rahway, New Jersey. They have two grown children, James William and Gladys Anne and six grandchildren.