Zionism: Imperialism in the Age of Counter-Revolution (criticism of cpgbml)

[AgentSonya]

Coercive Engineered Migration: Zionism’s War on Europe (Part 11 of an 11 part series)

During the 1920s General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Josef Stalin formulated what he considered to be the essential contribution of Lenin to Marxist political economy.Leninism, he wrote, is Marxism in the era of proletarian revolution. Since 1989 proletarian and national liberation revolutions throughout the world have been overturned by a general, global counter-revolutionary upsurge. It is a a political phenomenon that has seen the onslaught of US colour revolutions, which seek to do away with the bourgeois nation-state itself, the last barrier to the total exploitation of the world by the global corporate and financial elite.

In this essay I have argued that the contemporary form of this counter-revolutionary ideology, of this imperial drive for global domination, is Zionism. One could therefore, echoing Stalin’s definition of Leninism, assert that Zionism is imperialism in the age of capitalist counter-revolution. In other words, Zionism is the very form of contemporary Western imperialism. However, unlike Russian and Chinese imperialism, Western imperialism or Zionism has both a religious and ethnic dimension. Zionism is a Messianic and racist ideology which is not based simply on secular, Jewish nationalism but has its roots in Talmudism.

Zionism, through its control of Western finance capitalism, is striving for global governance. Lenin, writing in 1915, described as ‘indisputable’ the fact that ‘development is proceeding towards monopolies, hence, towards a single world monopoly, towards a single world trust’. But Lenin also pointed out that this drive towards unipolar global power would also intensify the contradictions in the global economy. A cogent example of this today is the low-intensity covert war currently being waged by the United States/Israel against Germany: The Western imperial alliance is turning on itself.

However, no people’s resistance to Zionism can be mounted if the empire continues to outsmart its opponents. The aforementioned General Barnett understands his enemies well. He used to teach Marxism in Harvard university and has written a book comparing the African policies of the German Democratic Republic and the Socialist Republic of Romania. In his book Blueprint For Action, he points out that the father of Fourth Generation Warfare is Mao Zedong. Imperial grand strategy is now waging war using techniques developed during the Chinese revolution, one of the greatest anti-colonial struggles in history. The key for anti-imperialist resistance today, therefore, has to be to understand how to turn the tools of imperialism against imperialism.

Marxism is an indispensable tool for understanding capitalism, but is insufficient for a full comprehension of the complexities of imperial strategy and tactics in the information age. Barnett and many other US and Israeli military strategists are keen students of social psychology, and in particular General Boyd’s OODA Loop Theory. The OODA stands for observation, orientation, decision, action. According to Boyd, decision-making occurs in a recurring cycle of observe-orient-decide-act. An entity (whether an individual or an organisation) that can process this cycle quickly, observing and reacting to unfolding events more rapidly than an opponent, can thereby “get inside” the opponent’s decision cycle and gain the advantage.

One could see this psychology at work during the Arab Spring. The rigid ideological orientation of the average ‘leftist’ saw the uprisings in Tunisia as proof that people were rebelling against a US-backed dictator and his ‘neo-liberal’ regime. This interpretation was reinforced by strategically placed ‘critics’ of US-foreign policy in the news station of Zionism’s ancillary regime, Qatar, while the initial indifference of the Western press confirmed the interpretation of the Tunisian revolt as a genuine, grass roots uprising against US imperialism.

US and Israeli strategists were capable of doing this through their deep understanding of ‘leftist’ discourse. They also understood that the ‘anti-globalisation’ form of the protest movement would fool genuine critics of US imperialism, thereby impeding their ability to react to the US-orchestrated revolutions in a rational manner.

In the Arab Spring, inverted Marxian dialectics, Systems Theory, Psychology, Military Science and Utility Theory were waged against a feckless and discombobulated anti-war movement who would repeat the sound bites of ‘popular uprising’ and the ‘defeat of US imperialism in the Middle East’ implanted in their minds by one of the most impressive and successful US/Israeli geostrategic operations in modern history.

On the eve of NATO’s bombing of Libya, the BBC predictably called upon an old reliable ‘critic of US foreign-policy’ Noam Chomsky. The veteran American philosopher agreed that the West had a “duty” to “stop the massacres” in Libya thus ensuring there would be no moral outrage among the so-called “anti-war movement” to a NATO military intervention. The invitation of Noam Chomsky by the Zionist-controlled BBC illustrates the importance for British intelligence of ideologically disarming potential ‘leftist’ opponents in the run-up to meticulously planned wars of aggression, disguised as ‘humanitarian interventions’.

Chomsky stated that ‘there may come a time when it would make sense for the West to become involved… but the question is has that time come.’ No anti-imperialist would ever suggest that it could make sense for the West to intervene militarily in another country, under any circumstances.

Given Chomsky’s anarchist ideology — the very ideology instrumentalised by the CIA in colour revolutions — the BBC knew he would go along with their fake ‘popular uprising’ in Benghazi; thus providing justification to wage ‘humanitarian’ warfare in support of the ‘revolution’.

In 2013, a massive military destablisation of Brazil was undertaken by US NGOs, operating under the guidance of the CIA, in order to weaken the popularity of a government moving far too close to Russia and China in the eyes of Washington. Again, the CIA’s ‘Vinegar Revolution’ received full support from most ‘leftist’ quarters. Once again, military geostrategy had triumphed over anti-imperialist analysis.

The current refugee crisis proves that US/Israeli military geostrategy is running circles around its opponents who, instead of identifying the culprits who are using human beings as weapons, are unwittingly collaborating with Zionism’s plan to inundate Europe with migrants for the purposes of fomenting civil war in the European peninsula. It is a desperate effort to prevent Eurasian integration, a prospect inimical to what the Pentagon refers to as ‘full spectrum dominance’.

Those who have joined in the chorus of welcoming the refugees/migrants are unwitting participants in an extension of Zionism’s neo-colonial wars in Africa and the Middle East. They are also complicit in the endorsement and cover-up of a modern slave trade. Opposing imperialism requires study of the logic of its geostrategic operations. Imperialism’s deliberate flooding of Europe with a Wahhabised lumpen-proletariat from a war-torn Southern Hemisphere will not help the cause of labour, the cause of human freedom. Rather, it will contribute to preventing the unification of the European-peninsula with the Eurasian Heartland. It will also contribute towards the further colonisation and destruction of independent African and Middle Eastern nations such as Eritrea and Syria.

An example of Marxist Leninist parties’ inability to deal with imperialism’s weaponization of migrants comes from the Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist Leninist). Their argument in favour of immigration is sound under normal circumstances but they fail to address the problem of when immigration becomes a tool of imperialism, a specific geopolitical strategy aimed at destabilizing both the country of origin and the destination of the migrant.

The recent resolution of the CPGBML is worth reproducing here in full:

This party firmly believes that immigration is not the cause of the ills of the working class in Britain, which are solely the result of the failings of the capitalist system.

Immigration and asylum legislation and controls under capitalism have only one real goal: the division of the working class along racial lines, thus fatally weakening that class’s ability to organise itself and to wage a revolutionary struggle for the overthrow of imperialism.

These controls have the further effect of creating an army of ‘illegal’ immigrant workers, prey to super exploitation and living in dire conditions as an underclass, outside the system, afraid to organise and exercising a downward pull on the wages and conditions of all workers.

The scourge of racism, along with all other ills of capitalism, will only be finally abolished after the successful overthrow of imperialism. But since immigration can no more be abolished under capitalism than can wage slavery, our call should not be for the further control and scapegoating of immigrants, but the abolition of all border controls, as part of the wider fight to uproot racism from the working-class movement and build unity among workers in Britain, so strengthening the fight for communism.

The problem here is that no distinction is made between immigration into imperialist countries and immigration into semi-colonial type countries. For example, Syria has been forced to close its borders due to the passage of terrorists in the service of imperialism. In such circumstances, it would be ludicrous to condemn the Syrian government for erecting fences to protect its borders. Similarly, Hungary, a small country which has just taken modest steps towards escaping from the clutches of US imperialism under the control of the IMF, has decided to erect fences to protect its borders from what it perceives as an attempt by US imperialism to destablize the country. Under these conditions, such a decision is entirely justified. The CPGBML argues correctly that “the scourge of racism, along with all other ills of capitalism, will only be finally abolished after the successful overthrow of imperialism.” The erection of fences in Hungary is part of that fight against imperialism, when migrants are clearly being used as weapons of imperialist strategy against recalcitrant nation-states.

The fact that Zionism is using the refugee crisis to further its imperialist agenda does not mean, however, that all refugees in the world are being used for this purpose. Rather, just as in the Arab Spring where the social inequalities of capitalism were used by imperialism to further the cause of capitalism, many refugees coming from the Middle East and Africa are being used for the same purpose.

Throughout the world Homo sapiens is being supplanted by Homo economicus: a vacuous, brain-washed, rootless cosmopolitan, a deterritorialised and acculturated nomad, hopelessly blown hither and thither by the exigencies of capital. Meanwhile, Zionism continues to stoke up the incessant and utterly fraudulent War on Terror, with omnipresent mass surveillance of the “nations” (goyim) while at the same time Jews are being encouraged by the Israeli regime to leave Europe for settlement on Arab lands, ruined and depopulated by Zionism’s wars.

The ‘refugee crisis’ is indubitably one more step towards the creation of a Greater Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu recently told the Israeli National News that Israel must become a “world power”.

To politically correct pundits, Victor Orban’s fence might appear inhumane and xenophobic, but at this moment in history the concrete choice presented to us is between temporary fences designed to protect nations from imperialism, or Zionist walls built to imprison humanity.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220128124 ... n-part-11/

[RedAlert]

CPGB-MLs concept of immigration only really works if you're an anarchist cosmopolitan.
Most of cpgb-ml are Londoners (unsurprisingly the capital city produces the most advanced communists but at the same time steeped in bourgeois cosmopolitan thought).

The CPGB-ML are essentially a pressure group for cosmopolitan imperialist policies used to divide and rule at home.

The Soviet Union was completely averse to immigration as shown by our recent thread
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=572

Stalin made the point in 1952 that the bourgeoisie had already overthrown the "banner of nations" ie become cosmopolitan. The bourgeois want a rootless cosmopolitan proletariat alongside a rootless cosmopolitan bourgeoisie, something this Gerard O Colmain elicits perfectly.

Earlier, the bourgeoisie, as the heads of nations, were for the rights and independence of nations and put that "above all." Now there is no trace left of this "national principle." Now the bourgeoisie sell the rights and independence of their nations for dollars. The banner of national independence and national sovereignty has been thrown overboard. Without doubt, you, the representatives of the communist and democratic parties must raise this banner and carry it forward if you want to be patriots of your countries, if you want to be the leading powers of the nations. There is nobody else to raise it. (Stormy applause.)

https://www.marxists.org/reference/arch ... /10/14.htm

Imperialism means the destruction of nations: great replacement in the Imperialist nations and outright bombing/coups/fascist death squads in the imperialized ones.

[Mandrake]

I watch them a long time and had plans to join but I was done with those faggots when they were pushing zero Covid and the clot shots

If you are top of a Communist Party and you are giving vaccine advice you should be at least aware of how Fauci killed hundreds of thousands of people during the "aids" crisis with the pure poison that was AZT

You should be aware of the polio epidemics as a result of the polio vaccines

The mercury scandal crossing the blood brain barrier in children in early 2000s

Operation Lockstep... Etc

God knows how many Communists cpgbml killed by scoffing about "conspiracy theories" in their retarded 9th congress who are now walking around with turbo cancers and prions and the self assembling lipid nanoparticles

[Charlotte]

Sad to see people shitting on cpgbml

I like them. Every party learns. Not every party is correct on every single line immediately.

[RepublicOfEngland]

In recent times I have become disillusioned.

Do not despair Comrade!
Communism is inevitable. The capitalists can maintain capitalism with an empire of lies. Noone believes the official narrative on anything anymore.

[CombatLiberalism]

Leila Khaled on Western ‘leftists’. Interesting how she notes the Western left are opposed to nationalism whilst describing them as a bunch of stupid hippys



From My People Shall Live, the Autobiography of a Revolutionary:

Most were graduates of the 1968 university upheavals in the West. We found it very amusing that they honestly believed they were making a 'revolution' if they undressed in public, seized a university building, or shouted an obscenity at bureaucrats. I was initially opposed and refused to talk to them, even though some believed in violent revolution, because I didn't want to be another experimental 'guinea-pig' to Westerners.

I finally relented and I am glad I did. I hadn't met Western 'revolutionaries' before. It turned out they represented an unfamiliar cultural rather than a political phenomenon.

Some seemed to have read the history political literature of the left, but most regarded the Marxist-Leninist leaders disdainfully, with the exception of the 'Young Marx, who held some sort of fascination for revolution.

Some Americans were quite serious and believed in the historic mission of the working class and were making plants to integrate themselves with the masses.

What astonished us most about this group was that they were opposed to nationalism, a doctrine we hold dearly as a colonized and dissipated people. Some believed in violence for the hell of it and in students as revolutionary agents of history. But the majority were inclined towards guerrilla theatre as a means of 'making revolution. They performed a little for us.

As they were departing I was rather struck by a French anarchist student who proclaimed 'Let chaos reign' and by a German who echoed the same sentiment.

I exclaimed that the Palestinian people were an example of a society in chaos without authority and leadership, which as a result, was left at the mercy of the Zionist oppressor.

I asked them what could they prescribe for us in order to overcome our kind of alienation'-beards, long hair, and toy guns?

They merely paused, they smiled, they reflected, they inhaled and passed their joints on in universal wonder.

[JoeySteel]

I watch them a long time and had plans to join but I was done with those faggots when they were pushing zero Covid and the clot shots

If you are top of a Communist Party and you are giving vaccine advice you should be at least aware of how Fauci killed hundreds of thousands of people during the "aids" crisis with the pure poison that was AZT

You should be aware of the polio epidemics as a result of the polio vaccines

The mercury scandal crossing the blood brain barrier in children in early 2000s

Operation Lockstep... Etc

God knows how many Communists cpgbml killed by scoffing about "conspiracy theories" in their retarded 9th congress who are now walking around with turbo cancers and prions and the self assembling lipid nanoparticles

I mean noone is going to ban you for words like the retards over at reddit but some decorum to comrades in a Communist Party should be given..

[JoeySteel]

CPGB-MLs concept of immigration only really works if you're an anarchist cosmopolitan.
Most of cpgb-ml are Londoners (unsurprisingly the capital city produces the most advanced communists but at the same time steeped in bourgeois cosmopolitan thought).

The CPGB-ML are essentially a pressure group for cosmopolitan imperialist policies used to divide and rule at home.

This is absolutely fucking ridiculous to claim they are pressure group of cosmopolitan imperialism

[RedAlert]

I mean what else can you call their pamphlet on Capitalism and Immigration?
Here they are telling you why you should be pro immigration...Because the bourgeoisie are

We at Lalkar don’t believe immigration is the great problem that bourgeois politicians of all stripes would have us believe. In fact, the captains of industry (what industry is actually left) and the majority of those great and good personages haunting Westminster’s tea rooms and occasionally parking their sanctimonious backsides on the much-coveted green seats of supposed power, also understand that immigration is not some horror coming over the Channel in little boats to destroy our society.

http://www.lalkar.org/article/4408/immi ... ts-for-all

If migration produced revolutionaries we'd have had ten Communist Revolutions by now.
But migration (and this is why the bourgeois support it) produces social-democrats, liberals and Conservatives.
Who can forget that Afghan man running for the Tory party?
https://brentford.nub.news/news/local-n ... n-hounslow

Instead of being forced to confront imperialism at home they become detached cosmopolitans seeking to get all the crumbs they can from imperialist society.
At home this Afghan would either be forced to take up arms against imperialism or, more likely, face execution by the revolutionary forces in Afghanistan for collaborating with US imperialism

Either way suits me, as a communist, much better than yet another social-democrat and liberal

I mean there's a reason Amazon tracks diversity and ranks their "unionisation threat level" against places with the least diversity.

Leaked internal documents from Amazon-owned Whole Foods reveal the company rates their stores using a "diversity index" and determined the threat of unionization is "higher" at stores with "lower diversity."

https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=61403